Trump invokes executive privilege over Mueller report

President Donald Trump invoked blanket executive privilege over...

Posted: May 8, 2019 12:20 PM
Updated: May 8, 2019 1:30 PM

President Donald Trump invoked blanket executive privilege over Robert Mueller's full report Wednesday in retribution for a pending vote by House Democrats to hold Attorney General William Barr in contempt of Congress.

The move significantly escalated a constitutional confrontation between the House Democratic majority and the President over the aftermath of the special counsel's Russia investigation. It will trigger a bitter and potentially long battle in the courts to adjudicate whether the executive branch or the legislative branch of the government will prevail.

The Justice Department informed House Judiciary Chairman Jerry Nadler Wednesday morning in a letter that the 'President has asserted executive privilege over the entirety of the subpoenaed materials.'

Nadler had previously subpoenaed Barr to require the handover of a full, unredacted version of the Mueller report that the public has yet to see as well as supporting evidence gathered by Mueller.

White House press secretary Sarah Sanders made clear the decision was a direct response to a scheduled vote in the committee to hold Barr in contempt over his refusal to accept Nadler's demands -- after releasing a redacted public version of the report last month.

'Faced with Chairman Nadler's blatant abuse of power, and at the attorney general's request, the President has no other option than to make a protective assertion of executive privilege,' Sanders said.

Assertions of executive privilege are often used to shield materials held within the executive branch from production to another branch of government or the general public. The hard-to-define and rarely litigated concept is often justified on the grounds that withholding information from public disclosure protects the President's ability to get private advice from his subordinates to ensure the functioning of government.

Barr sent a letter dated Wednesday to the President, requesting he make a protective assertion of executive privilege with respect to the documents the House committee subpoenaed.

The decision is a 'protective assertion' of privilege -- which would allow the evaluation of individual requests for information down the road.

But it raises the question of why Trump is so keen to prevent the full disclosure of a report that he claimed offers him 'complete and total exoneration,' an assertion not supported by the facts.

The Mueller report did not establish a conspiracy between Trump's campaign in 2016 and a Russian election meddling effort. And Mueller did not come to a definitive conclusion about whether the President obstructed justice -- despite laying out evidence for and against such a finding.

But Democrats are accusing the President of using executive privilege to cover up an investigation that shows that he is guilty of wrongdoing.

House Speaker Nancy Pelosi on Wednesday mocked Barr for having a 'temper tantrum' over demands for more disclosure about the special counsel report.

And Nadler said on CNN's 'New Day' that the attorney general had now proven that his priority was to abet the administration's 'lawlessness.'

'Attorney General Barr has ... gone from being a personal attorney to the President instead of the attorney general of the United States and he's now gone a step further and made the entire Justice Department an agency for enabling the President to defy the law, to defy any type of accountability and to act as a monarch, to say that Congress can have no role in accountability,' Nadler said.

In his letter to the President, Barr explained that 'although the subpoenaed materials assuredly include categories of information within the scope of executive privilege,' they may not all be protected by the privilege, and that ultimate determination will likely be for a federal judge to decide.

In the meantime, the real question will be whether the House can successfully proceed with calling witnesses involved in the investigation.

Democrats are hoping to secure testimony of Mueller himself, possibly as soon as next week.

Trump's assertion of protective executive privilege over subpoenaed documents has no direct bearing on Mueller testifying before the House, according to a Justice Department official.

From a practical standpoint, however, whether a legal battle over the underlying documents affects Mueller's testimony remains to be seen.

The official further disagreed with Nadler's assertion that the President waived executive privilege by providing materials to Mueller in the first place, saying there is past precedent for providing materials to law enforcement.

Nadler set Wednesday's Judiciary Committee vote to hold Barr in contempt after the attorney general did not agree to comply with a subpoena for the documents by Monday's 9 a.m. ET deadline.

If the committee finds against Barr, likely on partisan lines, a contempt report would be sent to the full House for a vote.

During Wednesday's meeting, Nadler said the Justice Department was heading in the wrong direction with its 'dramatic step' in asking Trump to invoke protective assertion of executive privilege.

'Besides misapplying the doctrine of executive privilege -- since the White House waived these privileges long ago, and the Department seemed open to sharing these materials with us just yesterday -- this decision represents a clear escalation in the Trump Administration's blanket defiance of Congress's constitutionally mandated duties,' Nadler said in his opening statement.

Last month, the Justice Department released a redacted version of the Mueller report to the public, and a version with fewer redactions to a limited number of members of Congress. It did not release the supporting evidence underlying the Special Counsel's deliberations.

Barr redacted four types of information from the Mueller report: grand jury material, classified information, material tied to ongoing investigations, and information that could harm 'peripheral third parties.'

The Justice Department offered on Tuesday to allow more staffers to view the less-redacted version that was made available to select congressional leaders, but Democrats rejected the department's offer.

Instead, they requested that the Justice Department commit to working with the committee to go to court to obtain grand jury material -- or at least not oppose the committee's effort to do so, according to a committee spokesman.

Democrats have said they are entitled to view grand jury material, but Barr has maintained he's not legally allowed to provide that material to Congress. They also requested a meeting this week to discuss providing the committee access to Mueller's evidence and that the full membership of the judiciary and intelligence committees should be able to view the less-redacted report.

Democrats have said they need Mueller's evidence, specifically citing in a letter last week the FBI's witness interviews and contemporaneous notes that witnesses provided to the special counsel's team, which is cited throughout the report.

CNN's Manu Raju, Jeremy Herb and Betsy Klein contributed to this report.

Huntsville/Redstone
Partly Cloudy
36° wxIcon
Hi: 52° Lo: 31°
Feels Like: 32°
Muscle Shoals
Partly Cloudy
36° wxIcon
Hi: 55° Lo: 30°
Feels Like: 32°
Huntsville/Madison
Partly Cloudy
33° wxIcon
Hi: 52° Lo: 29°
Feels Like: 33°
Decatur
Clear
33° wxIcon
Hi: 54° Lo: 31°
Feels Like: 28°
Fort Payne
Partly Cloudy
27° wxIcon
Hi: 52° Lo: 33°
Feels Like: 27°
WAAY Radar
WAAY WAAY-TV Cam
WAAY Temperatures

Alabama Coronavirus Cases

Cases: 422598

Reported Deaths: 6120
CountyCasesDeaths
Jefferson62039921
Mobile30225548
Madison27052186
Tuscaloosa20728267
Montgomery18978305
Shelby18504114
Baldwin16251182
Lee12465101
Morgan12233113
Etowah11735168
Calhoun11122200
Marshall10191107
Houston8598148
Cullman8023105
Limestone800274
Elmore7836101
DeKalb768397
Lauderdale754683
St. Clair7535120
Talladega6166108
Walker5897174
Jackson580341
Colbert532073
Blount530483
Autauga518455
Coffee441056
Dale396181
Franklin366248
Chilton336165
Russell330310
Covington327268
Escambia316842
Dallas303196
Chambers282769
Clarke281433
Tallapoosa2616107
Pike248729
Marion245650
Lawrence243647
Winston226635
Bibb215147
Geneva201435
Marengo199029
Pickens196531
Hale175842
Barbour172936
Butler169658
Fayette168226
Cherokee160330
Henry153621
Monroe145217
Randolph139835
Washington137626
Clay126145
Crenshaw118744
Lamar118019
Cleburne117423
Macon114735
Lowndes110335
Wilcox103121
Bullock99028
Perry97419
Conecuh94420
Sumter89026
Greene76023
Coosa60515
Choctaw51224
Out of AL00
Unassigned00

Tennessee Coronavirus Cases

Cases: 685321

Reported Deaths: 8391
CountyCasesDeaths
Shelby761671128
Davidson70706661
Knox38646393
Hamilton34556326
Rutherford33114283
Unassigned22759126
Williamson21364138
Sumner18205230
Out of TN1612079
Wilson14405155
Montgomery14367149
Sullivan12577211
Washington11889191
Blount11887124
Maury10941123
Bradley1075190
Sevier10461108
Putnam9931136
Madison9099178
Robertson761885
Hamblen6954109
Anderson6759102
Greene6569108
Tipton619065
Gibson5630111
Coffee560681
Cumberland537872
Dickson534678
Bedford532086
Roane519179
Carter5091112
Lawrence507569
McMinn506673
Warren497553
Loudon493750
Jefferson474975
Dyer473682
Monroe455162
Hawkins444968
Franklin410758
Obion399478
Fayette396251
Rhea381556
Lincoln378344
Marshall343536
Cocke342856
Weakley339448
Cheatham335230
Henderson332056
Campbell323940
Giles321071
White310043
Hardeman308752
Carroll307859
Hardin297647
Lauderdale293131
Macon287350
Wayne260719
Henry260358
Overton252942
DeKalb241741
Haywood239745
McNairy238142
Smith230527
Trousdale228714
Marion227731
Scott225231
Hickman222734
Fentress212531
Claiborne210129
Grainger208135
Johnson201532
Morgan188614
Crockett180338
Bledsoe174110
Chester173237
Unicoi166843
Cannon157019
Lake155319
Decatur147226
Polk142817
Grundy139320
Union138721
Sequatchie136518
Humphreys132617
Benton131935
Lewis127220
Meigs114016
Stewart105220
Jackson103721
Perry94725
Houston93922
Clay93726
Moore7959
Pickett67619
Van Buren6587
Hancock4026

Community Events