Trump administration's shifting stories fuel doubts over justification for Soleimani strike

CNN's Kaitlan Collins reports.

Posted: Jan 11, 2020 7:20 AM
Updated: Jan 11, 2020 7:20 AM

A week after the US killed Iran's second most powerful official, spiking tensions in the region and triggering fears of war, the Trump administration continues to present conflicting justifications for the deadly Reaper drone strike and clashing narratives about what has followed.

Again and again, President Donald Trump's national security officials have contradicted each other about how imminent a threat Qasem Soleimani posed, whether they had specific intelligence on the threat and even what that threat was, with Trump saying one thing then another, while officials offered varying explanations.

Administration officials even appear to disagree on the roles that Trump's principal advisers played, with the Defense Department pushing back on claims by sources close to Secretary of State Mike Pompeo that the top US diplomat was a prime actor in directing troop movements.

The confusion has extended to events following Soleimani's killing, as the administration offered diverging narratives about Iran's retaliatory attack on US forces in Iraq Wednesday and the departments of Treasury and State presented mismatched details on Iran sanctions Friday.

Bungled explanations

Amid the fog, lawmakers from both parties have blasted the administration for failing to share intelligence to support or explain its decisions. Administration officials who briefed them insist they explained aspects of the threat that -- bizarrely -- several members of Congress say weren't discussed at all.

The result is that over a week after Trump pushed the region to the edge of possible conflict, lawmakers and the public remain in the dark about the reasons why.

"From the very get-go, the public messaging has raised all kinds of questions about whether or not there was sufficient motivation to launch an attack to kill arguable the second most powerful and important man in Iran," said Aaron David Miller, a senior fellow at the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace.

Explanations have been "bungled at I don't know how many levels by the contradictory statements," Miller said. The confusion has implications for US national security, he said. "They've created tremendous problems in terms of transparency and credibility, which are critically important if we're entering a period of potential escalation or even war."

What was the threat?

On Thursday, it depended on the time of day the President was speaking.

At a late morning event in the White House's Roosevelt Room, he told the crowd that "we did it because they were looking to blow up our embassy. We also did it for other reasons that were very obvious. Somebody died -- one of our military people died," an apparent reference to the death of a US contractor after a rocket attack by a militia close to Iran.

A few hours later, Trump added other justifications. Soleimani "was looking very seriously at our embassies, and not just the embassy in Baghdad," he said at a rally in Ohio. And on Friday, he offered greater detail in an interview with Fox News, saying that "I believe it would've been four embassies."

Asked about Trump's initial claim that "they were looking to blow up our embassy," administration officials said Thursday that the President had been referring to the storming of the embassy that had already occurred.

Later in the day, a senior defense official told reporters that there had actually been a plot to attack the embassy involving explosives, one of multiple plots Soleimani was allegedly working that was separate and clearly more sophisticated than the attempts to storm the embassy by Molotov-cocktail-wielding protestors.

But lawmakers who attended a briefing from Pompeo and Defense Secretary Esper said that if that was the rationale for killing Soleimani, the two senior officials hadn't bothered to tell them.

"Let's be clear - if there was evidence of imminent attacks on four embassies, the Administration would have said so at our Wednesday briefing," Sen. Chris Murphy, a Connecticut Democrat, said in a tweet. "They didn't. So either Fox News gets higher level briefings than Congress...or...wait for it...there was no such imminent threat."

Sen. Bernie Sanders, the Democratic presidential candidate, told NBC Friday morning that neither Pompeo nor Esper raised embassy plots in the briefing, and when Sen. Tim Kaine of Virginia was asked about it, he said, "that's news to me based on sitting through that hearing yesterday."

"I sat through that hearing. I listened very carefully. I definitely would have known if anyone said that," Kaine said. GOP Sen. Mike Lee of Utah called the session the "worst briefing I've had on a military issue in my nine years" in the Senate.

On the House side, Florida Rep. Val Demings, a member of the House Intelligence committee, also said lawmakers weren't informed about any threat to a US embassy. "Do you think that he had a nightmare and thought it was reality," she asked of Trump's claim.

Despite this, Pompeo insisted Friday that he and Esper had, in fact, briefed lawmakers about the embassy threat during the closed-door classified Senate session Wednesday.

"We did," he said. "Yes. We told them about the imminent threat. All of the intelligence that we briefed -- that you've heard today I assure you in an unclassified setting, we provide in the classified setting, as well," Pompeo said.

Pressed again, Pompeo said, "I'm not going to talk about the details of what we shared in a classified setting, but make no mistake about it: those leaders, those members of Congress who want to go access this same intelligence can see that very same intelligence that will reflect what I'm describing and what the President said last night."

Lawmakers have also challenged the administration on the "question of imminence," as Pompeo puts it. The idea that the threat is imminent is crucial to legally justify Soleimani's January 3 killing.

But when asked how immediate the threat had been, administration officials have often referred to Soleimani's past activities or pointed to the US contractor's death in Iraq as evidence. "There was lots of intelligence," Pompeo said January 5. "You've seen some of it's out in the public, right? The death of the American on December 27th."

One Republican congressional source with knowledge of the events questioned the idea there was an imminent threat and said the contractor's death may have been the more pivotal factor because of Trump's fears he could face a hostage situation like that in 1979 Iran or US citizen deaths like the 2012 tragedy in Benghazi, Libya.

"The intelligence may be no different of (Soleimani) planning" attacks similar to those he'd conducted in the past, this source said. Many analysts note Soleimani's movements about the region were not unusual. "If an American hadn't died, I don't think any of this would have happened."

While Esper told CNN on January 8 said the threat was "only a matter of days, certainly no more than weeks" away, Pompeo has emphasized that the exact timing doesn't matter. The timetable "is not something that's relevant" to Americans in the region, Pompeo told CNN.

Chairman of the Joint Chiefs Gen. Mark Milley said the intelligence was "compelling, it was imminent, and it was very, very clear in scale, scope." But then he went on to caveat heavily, saying, "did it exactly say who, what, when, where? No."

On Friday, even as lawmakers continued to question the administration's claims, Pompeo refused to define in time increments what "imminent" meant and insisted there was no contradiction in saying an attack was imminent even if he didn't know when it would happen. "Those are completely consistent thoughts," he said, speaking at the White House. "I don't know exactly which minute. We don't know exactly which day it would have been executed, but it was very clear."

'A lot doesn't add up'

The Carnegie Endowment's Miller, referring to the 180-degree disconnect on the briefings to lawmakers and the crucial question of imminence, said "there's a lot, a lot, that doesn't add up."

The mixed messages have continued about events in the days after the January 3 drone strike on Soleimani, particularly about Iran's retaliatory missile attacks early Wednesday on Iraqi bases that host US forces.

Iran's ambassador to the United Nations Majid Takht Ravanchi told CNN's John Berman Friday that targets were chosen "in order to show that we are capable of hitting the target where the plan to kill Soleimani was organized," and added that "we are not looking after killing Americans within this operation."

In the immediate aftermath of the attack, multiple administration officials came to that conclusion, telling CNN they believed Iran had intentionally missed areas populated by Americans to send a message, rather than take significant enough action to provoke a US military response.

But a few days later, the story shifted. Esper and Milley were the first to charge that Iran had intended to kill Americans. Vice President Mike Pence echoed them, telling Fox on Thursday there is "no doubt in my mind they were intending to kill Americans."

While Trump's senior officials pivoted in lockstep on that talking point, there have been signs of internal discord. After CNN reported that a source in Pompeo's inner circle described his close work with Milley and the commander of CENTCOM to assess the profile of troops in the field, a senior US defense official signaled that Pompeo's allies may be inflating his role.

While Esper and Pompeo have a very good relationship, this official said, Esper drives many of the decisions and had full control and ownership of all issues relating to the defense department and the disposition of US troops.

The official added that Esper was in close contact with Pompeo, however, and kept him apprised of troop deployments to secure US facilities in the region.

CORRECTION: This story has been updated to accurately reflect that Milley and Esper publicly suggested Iran sought to kill Americans during its Wednesday strikes on Iraqi bases before Pence made the same claim.

Huntsville/Redstone
Mostly Cloudy
55° wxIcon
Hi: 72° Lo: 45°
Feels Like: 55°
Muscle Shoals
Partly Cloudy
57° wxIcon
Hi: 74° Lo: 36°
Feels Like: 57°
Huntsville/Madison
Cloudy
56° wxIcon
Hi: 72° Lo: 41°
Feels Like: 56°
Decatur
Partly Cloudy
52° wxIcon
Hi: 73° Lo: 40°
Feels Like: 52°
Fort Payne
Cloudy
44° wxIcon
Hi: 72° Lo: 40°
Feels Like: 44°
WAAY Radar
WAAY WAAY-TV Cam
WAAY Temperatures

Alabama Coronavirus Cases

Cases: 488973

Reported Deaths: 9660
CountyCasesDeaths
Jefferson703321342
Mobile35725716
Madison32088437
Tuscaloosa23913404
Montgomery22369481
Shelby21714209
Baldwin19554263
Lee14827147
Morgan13529243
Etowah13091309
Calhoun13063281
Marshall11197202
Houston10019255
Limestone9303130
Elmore9283179
Cullman8856176
St. Clair8747214
Lauderdale8541209
DeKalb8419173
Talladega7424161
Walker6466240
Jackson6450101
Autauga614384
Blount6058125
Colbert5973118
Coffee522299
Dale4606106
Russell400530
Franklin396575
Covington3918105
Chilton380096
Escambia375970
Tallapoosa3533138
Clarke342348
Dallas3385139
Chambers3382102
Pike292471
Lawrence280685
Marion277492
Winston244563
Marengo243454
Bibb243259
Geneva238168
Pickens223453
Barbour208450
Hale208064
Fayette198755
Butler194865
Henry181741
Cherokee175737
Monroe165538
Randolph161240
Washington155832
Crenshaw143052
Clay142554
Macon140344
Cleburne136139
Lamar130632
Lowndes130148
Wilcox120525
Bullock116033
Conecuh106423
Perry104927
Sumter98231
Greene86732
Coosa86323
Choctaw54723
Out of AL00
Unassigned00

Tennessee Coronavirus Cases

Cases: 767315

Reported Deaths: 11198
CountyCasesDeaths
Shelby863831451
Davidson80598835
Knox45139569
Hamilton39899450
Rutherford37781371
Williamson24944202
Sumner21120312
Montgomery17171207
Out of TN1659390
Wilson16157208
Unassigned15617126
Sullivan14142273
Blount13905176
Bradley12699137
Washington12659231
Maury12124158
Sevier11870160
Putnam10525167
Madison10030225
Robertson8866117
Hamblen7936160
Anderson7874155
Greene7251144
Tipton688699
Coffee6254114
Gibson6166140
Dickson6118103
Cumberland6070117
Carter5922152
McMinn585589
Roane579995
Bedford5744117
Loudon561464
Jefferson5569116
Lawrence554080
Warren529475
Monroe524988
Dyer5221100
Hawkins517092
Franklin469983
Fayette463571
Obion435694
Rhea411272
Lincoln409861
Cocke395691
Marshall387754
Cheatham385143
Campbell377458
Weakley377459
Giles370495
Henderson360673
Carroll346580
Hardeman337563
Macon334873
White333765
Hardin329562
Lauderdale308842
Henry298274
Marion289144
Wayne286330
Scott284842
Overton283257
Claiborne271665
Haywood264159
McNairy264151
Hickman262339
DeKalb261547
Smith252236
Grainger240446
Trousdale237722
Fentress228244
Morgan228236
Johnson214337
Chester200446
Bledsoe197910
Crockett196746
Unicoi179047
Cannon173528
Polk173221
Union168030
Lake167326
Grundy165730
Sequatchie153627
Decatur153135
Humphreys151121
Benton149939
Lewis145724
Meigs125420
Jackson124633
Stewart123024
Clay106030
Perry102327
Houston102030
Moore93616
Van Buren79120
Pickett74623
Hancock49212

Community Events