STREAMING NOW: Watch Now

Why Steve King's spin on his 'white supremacist' comments just doesn't work

In the wake of his House Republican colleagues stripping Iowa GOP Congressman Steve King's committee assignm...

Posted: Jan 15, 2019 9:48 PM
Updated: Jan 15, 2019 9:48 PM

In the wake of his House Republican colleagues stripping Iowa GOP Congressman Steve King's committee assignments after he openly wondered how -- and why -- terms like "white supremacist" became a bad thing, King tried to fight back with the age-old "but context!" argument.

"Leader McCarthy's decision to remove me from committees is a political decision that ignores the truth," said King in a statement released Monday night. "The truth is as follows: One of my quotes in a New York Times story has been completely mischaracterized."

Discrimination

Political Figures - US

Racism and racial discrimination

Right-wing extremism

Societal issues

Society

Steve King (Politician)

White supremacy and neo-Nazism

2017 Charlottesville white nationalist rally

Charlottesville

Civil disobedience

Companies

Continents and regions

Government and public administration

Government organizations - US

New York Times Co

North America

Politics

Protests and demonstrations

Southeastern United States

The Americas

United States

US Congress

US House of Representatives

Virginia

How, you ask? Well, it's complicated, but the basic argument goes like this: King and Trip Gabriel, The New York Times reporter who wrote the piece on King that has caused all the controversy, talked for a long time (56 minutes, according to King) and that what King was really wondering about was when "Western civilization" became a bad word, not when "white supremacist" or "white nationalist" did.

Here's the full quote from King to Gabriel: "White nationalist, white supremacist, Western civilization — how did that language become offensive? Why did I sit in classes teaching me about the merits of our history and our civilization?"

It seems pretty clear what he's saying there -- and it doesn't comport with his explanation that, after a list of allegedly offensive terms, he was only referencing the last one ("Western civilization") when he wondered when it became offensive.

In a vacuum, you might be willing to give King the benefit of the doubt. He misspoke. He spoke inarticulately. Whatever.

The problem of course is that King doesn't live in a vacuum -- and neither do the rest of us. And the same context that King wants us to consider when it comes to his quote to The New York Times dooms his attempt to cast this whole thing as one big misunderstanding.

Consider this far-from-complete list of King's controversial comments and actions over the past few years:

Notice a common theme emerging? King has repeatedly given voice to racist views -- and then either said he didn't mean to say what he said, he didn't know what he was doing was wrong or, yes, he was misquoted.

On the House floor Tuesday, King maintained that the quote was taken out of context. "There is no tape for this interview. ... The New York Times has a different version of this. They make a habit of attacking the President."

Here's the thing: If you have a proven track record of saying racist things, you are a racist. That's it.

Now, I understand why King wants to make this all about how the GOP leadership in the House is being mean to him and how some reporter for The New York Times treated him badly. (FYI: Trip Gabriel didn't.) Because the alternative is to accept, well, that he holds racist views. And that's a tough pill to swallow.

The other problem created by King's attempted explanation is that it makes very clear that he has NO plans to leave the House anytime soon. By trying to fight back -- against both the media and the Republican leadership -- King is trying to rally the Trump base behind him one last time. He's trying to cast this whole thing as a liberal -- wait for it -- witch hunt, and his refusal to back down as a courageous (and principled) stand against the ever-encroaching forces of political correctness.

Which means that statements like this one from Wyoming Rep. Liz Cheney -- "I agree with Leader McConnell. I think (King) should find another line of work" -- don't really mean much. King won -- albeit narrowly -- in 2018, despite having a well-funded opponent who centered the campaign on the series of very controversial racist statements King has made over the years.

The same argument that makes clear King carries racist views (he's been spouting them for years!) also makes the case for why it will be tough for Republicans to remove him from office if he doesn't want to go (he's been spouting racist views for years!) Voters knew at least most of what they were getting when they elected King last November. His latest comment to The New York Times is simply a(nother) way of saying what he believes -- and has been saying -- for years. It's not anything new.

All of which means two things: 1) Steve King isn't some sort of misunderstood racial healer (or even someone with anything close to mainstream views on race) and 2) Steve King is likely to be a problem for House Republicans for months to come.

Huntsville
Scattered Clouds
89° wxIcon
Hi: 88° Lo: 67°
Feels Like: 90°
Florence
Few Clouds
86° wxIcon
Hi: 87° Lo: 67°
Feels Like: 88°
Fayetteville
Clear
88° wxIcon
Hi: 88° Lo: 65°
Feels Like: 90°
Decatur
Scattered Clouds
89° wxIcon
Hi: 87° Lo: 66°
Feels Like: 90°
Scottsboro
Clear
88° wxIcon
Hi: 88° Lo: 69°
Feels Like: 93°
WAAY Radar
WAAY WAAY-TV Cam
WAAY Temperatures

Alabama Coronavirus Cases

Confirmed Cases: 91776

Reported Deaths: 1639
CountyConfirmedDeaths
Jefferson12039228
Mobile9170197
Montgomery6305147
Madison508227
Tuscaloosa398466
Baldwin326323
Shelby307532
Marshall298433
Unassigned281255
Lee251940
Morgan224315
Etowah195728
DeKalb171813
Elmore162637
Calhoun159012
Walker147464
Houston132712
Dallas129423
Russell12471
St. Clair123612
Limestone120813
Franklin120620
Cullman115711
Colbert110712
Lauderdale109512
Autauga103020
Escambia97915
Talladega92713
Jackson8704
Chambers82838
Tallapoosa82278
Dale78722
Butler75135
Blount7413
Chilton7226
Coffee7165
Covington71520
Pike6607
Barbour5635
Lowndes55824
Marion54724
Marengo52614
Clarke4879
Hale45726
Bullock44111
Winston43211
Perry4314
Wilcox4089
Monroe3954
Randolph39110
Bibb3813
Conecuh37210
Pickens3719
Sumter35918
Lawrence3240
Washington31412
Macon31113
Crenshaw2973
Choctaw27612
Cherokee2477
Henry2463
Greene24511
Geneva2420
Clay2235
Lamar2032
Fayette1765
Cleburne1211
Coosa922
Out of AL00

Tennessee Coronavirus Cases

Confirmed Cases: 112441

Reported Deaths: 1117
CountyConfirmedDeaths
Shelby21728293
Davidson19563205
Rutherford615553
Hamilton572047
Knox410837
Williamson330822
Sumner321970
Unassigned29575
Out of TN278914
Wilson210222
Sevier17565
Montgomery175212
Bradley173910
Putnam160113
Trousdale15766
Robertson145919
Hamblen129713
Blount11817
Tipton11239
Maury10897
Washington10892
Madison92913
Bedford87711
Macon84113
Sullivan8339
Hardeman83011
Lake7560
Loudon6823
Bledsoe6741
Fayette6428
Anderson6307
Dickson6091
Gibson5902
Dyer5687
Cheatham5486
Rhea5111
Jefferson5083
McMinn49320
Lawrence4916
Henderson4690
Obion4534
Lauderdale4386
Carter4335
Warren4294
Coffee4212
Cocke4121
Hardin4097
Haywood4025
Roane3922
Cumberland3856
Smith3843
Monroe3779
Greene3765
Hawkins3694
Giles35410
McNairy3245
DeKalb3221
Weakley3103
Franklin2864
Marshall2662
Lincoln2551
Carroll2443
Crockett2364
Claiborne2350
Hickman2330
Henry2250
Campbell2211
Wayne2191
Marion2094
White2053
Chester1962
Grainger1790
Polk1793
Johnson1770
Decatur1692
Overton1391
Unicoi1390
Union1290
Cannon1260
Humphreys1093
Benton1081
Jackson1081
Scott1050
Grundy1022
Meigs990
Sequatchie960
Morgan911
Fentress760
Hancock761
Perry740
Stewart700
Clay640
Lewis581
Houston540
Moore440
Van Buren330
Pickett251

Community Events