Scientist takes on genetically modified humans

In a video posted on YouTube, Chinese scientist He Jiankui announced to the world that he successfully used the gene-editing tool CRISPR-Cas9 to modify the DNA of two embryos before birth, essentially creating the world's first genetically modified humans.

Posted: Dec 2, 2018 12:37 PM
Updated: Dec 2, 2018 1:02 PM

Humanity was reluctantly dragged into a new era this week.

In a video posted on YouTube, Chinese scientist He Jiankui announced to the world that he successfully used the gene-editing tool CRISPR-Cas9 to modify the DNA of two embryos before birth, essentially creating the world's first genetically modified humans.

The news, delivered on the eve of a high-profile scientific meeting in Hong Kong on human gene editing, left the science community in shock. "I see it as one of those moments that happens once every few decades," said William Hurlbut, Senior Research Scholar at Stanford University Medical Center's Department of Neurobiology. "Where someone does something that so dramatically changes the landscape that the world will never be the same again."

But the scientist who accomplished this history-altering feat was not celebrated nor lavished with praise. In fact, his whereabouts are currently unknown. He skipped out early of the very event where he presented his research amid calls for a probe into this work. The Chinese authorities have opened an "immediate investigation" into He and ordered those involved in the project to suspend their activities.

Editing the DNA of human embryos that go on to deliver has never been done before. And with good reason, scientists say. The technology is still in its infancy and could lead to a multitude of unknown genetic complications later in life.

Scientists have reached an understanding that implanting such an embryo is a boundary that shouldn't be crossed until the risks are reduced or eliminated. "No one expected that someone would do this experiment on a human embryo," Feng Zhang, one of the inventors of the gene-editing technique CRISPR and member of the Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard told CNN. "The scientific community didn't actually know anything about what was going on."

He, a professor at the Southern University of Science and Technology in Shenzhen, said he was "proud" of his work that resulted in two ostensibly healthy twin girls born from embryos altered to make them resistant to HIV. But he was condemned by his peers and the experiment was labeled "monstrous," "unethical," and a "huge blow" to the reputation of Chinese biomedical research.

That He could tinker with life changing technology away from the eyes of regulators and purportedly even the university where he conducted the experiment, has raised serious ethical questions around the transparency of gene editing and sparked calls for a globally binding code of conduct.

The case also places renewed scrutiny on China, a leader in the field of genome editing and biotechnology that has historically had a reputation for sidestepping ethical questions in favor of innovation.

But deeper questions are being asked as to whether it is now inevitable that this technology will be used in the future.

"Never before have humans had power like this over our own biology," Hurlbut said. "We are now in the era of germline genetic engineering."

'A wake up call'

Ultimately, genome editing shows huge promise in one day treating diseases that are currently untreatable, such as sickle cell disease, or cystic fibrosis. But scientists at the Second International Summit on Human Genome Editing, where He appeared on Wednesday, overwhelmingly said the science needed to be made as effective and safe as possible -- and it was "irresponsible" to use germline editing in a clinical setting at this stage.

Germline gene-editing refers to genetic changes in every cell, that will be passed on to future generations. This is different to somatic (body) cell gene-editing, whereby only existing cells are targeted and the changes made are not passed on to future offspring.

Apart from raising ethical concerns, scientists said the gene He "edited-out," called CCR5, is crucial to the human immune system, and removing it increases the risk of susceptibility to other diseases such as the West Nile virus and influenza. Other critics pointed to the fact that the procedure was not medically necessary as there are other treatments for HIV.

Making changes to an embryo could also have unknown consequences that could be passed down to future generations.

It was evident that He had not fully considered the potential long-term social effects on the twin girls. When one audience member at the summit asked whether He had thought about how the girls would see themselves and how they would be treated by society, he replied: "I don't know how to answer this question."

Scientists at the summit pointed out that He's approach to the study had been flawed from start to finish, in particular the way he obtained informed consent from the parents -- a process that took place over just two sessions lasting a total of three hours, and without an independent third party to properly explain the risks and benefits.

He's research has prompted scientists to call for greater transparency and some form of global governance in the field.

"There has been a failure of self-regulation by the scientific community because of the lack of transparency," said Conference Chairman and Nobel laureate David Baltimore on Wednesday.

'A gold rush on new kind of knowledge'

That the announcement of the world's first genetically edited babies came out of China is perhaps not surprising.

Chinese scientists have accomplished many firsts in the genome world, including the first CRISPR-edited monkeys, the first use of the gene-editing tool CRISPR-Cas9 in humans, and the first reported use of gene editing technology to modify nonviable human embryos.

China has also pumped huge amounts of government money into gene-editing technology, using it to lure leading Chinese scientists living abroad back to the country, as well as foreigners who see the country as fertile ground for this kind of research.

"I just think right now China is a lot more driven, they incentivize their scientists to move faster and be bolder and it shows," said Victor J. Dzau, President of the Institute of Medicine at the US National Academy of Medicine.

Last year, China spent a record 1.76 trillion yuan ($254 billion) on research and development, and the country is catching up with the US' investment in the same area, spurring a genetic arms race that has been labeled "Sputnik 2.0" by Dr. Carl June, an immunotherapy specialist at the University of Pennsylvania.

And Chinese regulators appear more open to the new tech than its US counterparts. As of the end of February 2018, there were nine registered clinical studies testing CRISPR-edited cells to treat various cancers and HIV infection in China, according to Goldman Sachs analysis in April. That's compared to one in the US after the Food and Drug Administration lifted its hold on the first US-based human CRISPR trial in October.

"It's clear that this is the new frontier," said Hervé Chneiweiss of France's Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique. "It's clearly the gold rush on any kind of new knowledge that could be translated into new treatments."

Many of these treatments exist in a legal gray area. Currently, each country has their own rules and regulations surrounding gene-editing. China has several loosely-worded regulations restricting experimental science, including rules on embryo research. A 2003 directive to in-vitro clinics by the Chinese Ministry of Health barred "clinical experiments" that "violate ethical or moral principles."

"The problem is there are no penalties" if the guidelines are breached, said Renzong Qiu of the Chinese Academy of Social Sciences.

In an effort to show the world that China is holding up ethical standards, the nation's vice minister of the Ministry of Science and Technology, Xu Nanping, said Thursday that He had "brazenly violated Chinese laws and regulations and breached the science ethics bottom line."

Both the hospital named in He's ethical approval documents, and the university he is affiliated with, deny involvement in the procedures. And in a joint statement issued Monday, more than 120 Chinese scientists condemned the research, saying that "directly experimenting on humans is nothing but crazy."

"There's a misconception that the advance in research must necessarily come with being more flexible with respect to regulation," said David R Liu, professor of chemistry and chemical biology at Harvard University, who has pioneered improving versions of CRISPR. "I caution that people should not take away from recent news that China is being less vigilant or less caring about these ethical breaches than any other country."

In the short term, perhaps the greatest risk of misuse is not so much direct harm to people but the potentially chilling effect on legitimate research should governments and regulators push for greater restrictions.

Huntsville
Few Clouds
79° wxIcon
Hi: 92° Lo: 65°
Feels Like: 82°
Florence
Clear
79° wxIcon
Hi: 93° Lo: 67°
Feels Like: 82°
Fayetteville
Clear
75° wxIcon
Hi: 92° Lo: 65°
Feels Like: 75°
Decatur
Clear
75° wxIcon
Hi: 91° Lo: 65°
Feels Like: 75°
Scottsboro
Broken Clouds
79° wxIcon
Hi: 93° Lo: 68°
Feels Like: 83°
WAAY Radar
WAAY WAAY-TV Cam
WAAY Temperatures

Alabama Coronavirus Cases

Confirmed Cases: 49892

Reported Deaths: 1077
CountyConfirmedDeaths
Jefferson6030162
Mobile4418137
Montgomery4339109
Tuscaloosa254448
Madison19078
Marshall186611
Shelby150924
Lee149437
Morgan12205
Baldwin111410
Walker105127
Elmore98919
Dallas9639
Franklin92216
Etowah88214
DeKalb8416
Chambers65727
Russell6570
Autauga65313
Butler64328
Tallapoosa61669
Unassigned58626
Limestone5741
Houston5526
Cullman5395
Lauderdale5376
Lowndes48022
St. Clair4692
Colbert4656
Pike4595
Escambia4528
Calhoun4365
Coffee4074
Covington39911
Jackson3742
Bullock37010
Barbour3672
Dale3621
Talladega3497
Hale33722
Marengo33011
Wilcox2968
Clarke2946
Winston2893
Chilton2872
Sumter28512
Blount2731
Pickens2556
Monroe2492
Marion24514
Randolph2449
Conecuh2277
Perry2091
Bibb2081
Macon2069
Choctaw20212
Greene1928
Henry1433
Crenshaw1273
Washington1277
Lawrence1170
Cherokee1127
Geneva920
Lamar811
Fayette781
Clay742
Coosa621
Cleburne411
Out of AL00

Tennessee Coronavirus Cases

Confirmed Cases: 57591

Reported Deaths: 710
CountyConfirmedDeaths
Shelby12842214
Davidson12549138
Rutherford332638
Hamilton308837
Sumner180256
Williamson159115
Trousdale15055
Knox14719
Out of TN125610
Wilson109917
Putnam9897
Bradley8894
Robertson88213
Sevier8633
Unassigned8372
Lake6970
Tipton6746
Montgomery6587
Bledsoe6251
Bedford5959
Macon5466
Hamblen4224
Maury4203
Hardeman3814
Fayette3463
Madison3402
Loudon3081
Rhea2940
Blount2803
Dyer2743
McMinn25718
Cheatham2522
Dickson2430
Washington2120
Lawrence2026
Cumberland1964
Anderson1782
Sullivan1782
Lauderdale1723
Gibson1581
Jefferson1571
Monroe1466
Smith1392
Coffee1340
Cocke1260
Greene1232
Hardin1207
Obion1182
Haywood1112
Warren1060
Franklin1043
Marshall1042
Wayne990
Hickman980
McNairy911
Marion904
Giles801
Lincoln800
White803
Hawkins792
Carter771
DeKalb760
Roane750
Weakley691
Overton681
Campbell651
Grundy652
Henderson620
Claiborne610
Unicoi560
Chester530
Carroll511
Polk510
Grainger500
Crockett483
Henry480
Cannon450
Johnson440
Sequatchie430
Jackson410
Humphreys382
Meigs350
Perry350
Morgan291
Decatur280
Stewart260
Fentress250
Scott220
Union200
Houston190
Clay180
Moore170
Benton151
Hancock100
Lewis100
Pickett70
Van Buren70

 

 

Community Events